WTFPL is a terrible license

Please reconsider the choice of WTFPL as a license.

<script>
	// @author rubenwardy
	// @license magnet:?xt=urn:btih:1f739d935676111cfff4b4693e3816e664797050&dn=gpl-3.0.txt GPL-v3-or-Later

	var params = new URLSearchParams(location.search);
	var r = params.get("r");
	if (r) {
		document.write("<a class='alert_right button' href='" + r + "'>Okay</a>");
	} else {
		document.getElementById("warning").style.display = "none";
    }
</script>

The use of WTFPL as a license is discouraged for multiple reasons.

No Warranty disclaimer: This could open you up to being sued.^[1]
Swearing: This prevents settings like schools from using your content.
Not OSI Approved: Same as public domain?

The Open Source Initiative chose not to approve the license as an open-source license, saying:^[3]

It's no different from dedication to the public domain. Author has submitted license approval request – author is free to make public domain dedication. Although he agrees with the recommendation, Mr. Michlmayr notes that public domain doesn't exist in Europe. Recommend: Reject.

WTFPL is a terrible license

Sources