I can confirm that. Just look into the mod structure. And then, mod structure of devtest. Familiar, isn't it? The main difference is shorter technical names and that "z" instead of "s" on the end and some mods added/deleted.
Even initial_message mod says that "This is the \"Development Test\" [samz], meant only for testing and development." in init.lua.
And first commit.
I guess, Development Test ISN'T VERY GOOD BASE for a game "like Juanchi for kids". It's just weird! And where's attribution of devtest?
Btw, according to what he said in Package approval comments:
(...) my game is unique and unrepeatable.
Retextured DevTest with some "modz" instead of "mods" is UNIQUE AND UNREPEATABLE? Like, seriously? I can make hundreds of "unique" games like this, and will be approved? Just why??
And also, message for wsor: WHY did you approve this game? Is it THAT DIFFICULT for you to see obvious devtest copypaste?
When reviewing my mcl_decor mod, you just saw screenshots and said that I stole everything (when basically I didn't), just cuz nodes from my mod were looking familiar to homedecor and ts_furniture ones (sorry, but armchair in 1x1 node size cannot be that unique!), without even looking up in my code.
And after these all things, after weeks of making comments in approve thread and fixing license issues, I see THIS approved??? WHAT THE HELL?
Retextured DevTest with some "modz" instead of "mods" is UNIQUE AND UNREPEATABLE?
no, also this is runs langauge, not mine, i dont agree with it
Like, seriously? I can make hundreds of "unique" games like this, and will be approved? Just why??
stuff only gets approved that meets the package approval terms. the editors are only human.
And also, message for wsor: WHY did you approve this game? Is it THAT DIFFICULT for you to see obvious devtest copypaste?
i didnt look at the git history, normally am checking things found at https://content.minetest.net/policy_and_guidance/ such as license in the source (if there is a source) and it matches what is on cdb, that none of the assets are mc/mc texture packs from mc that i am aware of. (games)also looking to see if there are common mods that have had attributation stripped, etc. (mods) also looking to see if it uses a existing modname, and if that falls under the forks and reimplementations or not, etc. just to name a few things that are checked.
When reviewing my mcl_decor mod, you just saw screenshots and said that I stole everything (when basically I didn't),
no, i said it appeared you used content from other mods without citing them
just cuz nodes from my mod were looking familiar to homedecor and ts_furniture ones (sorry, but armchair in 1x1 node size cannot be that unique!), without even looking up in my code.
i actually did look at the code, repo, etc. additionally i had another cdb editor double check what i saw and agree, hence the first post. you did at least admit to one of them and fixed it. the others with consultation with another cdb editor we agreed to let pass, as could be common use, etc and could always be addressed later if more information came to light
And after these all things, after weeks of making comments in approve thread and fixing license issues, I see THIS approved??? WHAT THE HELL?
you can see this had its own issues before being approved, additionally, when it was reported and verified, it was taken down with changes needed
Okay, Wsor seems to be right (sorry for emotions in my previous comment) but I still have questions to runs. No license violations anymore as I can see, but I want to reply.
Taking Devtest as a base is perfect.
Basically, no? Like, DevTest isn't the right game for this, even if you will modify it a lot
I (and, I guess others too) need proofs about speed. Devtest can be fast cause it has only basic things inside and some test stuff, but your one is "supermodified and and super-vitaminized". If you will send them, maybe we will be like "Yeah, devtest is the best game ever, let's do forks of it cuz it's the fastest"? ;)
And also,
wsor4035 Do not listen to rudzik8. Let him mind his own business before he sees the speck in someone else's eye.
So, you're trying to make editor ignore user (in that case, me) just because this user said bad things about your game? Lol
And about "mind his own business": what do you mean? I didn't use assets from these mods, homedecor was inspiration for me (just like some minecrap furniture mods) and I took sitting function from ts_furniture, not a single nodebox or something. If you're making voxel furniture in 1x1 size nodes, it WILL look familiar to voxel furniture from other mods, but that doesn't mean one of those furniture mod authors is a plagiator.
In your case, you just took game made for development and testing stuff only and made weird mod soup out of it, without clear attribute. Now it's added, no problem. Just like no problem with my mcl_decor mod.
What does he care if they approve my game? Let him try to do things right like I try to do my own without looking at what others are doing.
If I'm a "novice" modder, that means I can't say anything about your game or what? You just don't like listening to criticism as I can see. That's ridiculous for you as a modder.
Your first comment there already was enough, but anyway you wrote 2 more emotional crap. bruh
Like, WTH?
I can confirm that. Just look into the mod structure. And then, mod structure of devtest. Familiar, isn't it? The main difference is shorter technical names and that "z" instead of "s" on the end and some mods added/deleted.
Even
initial_messagemod says that"This is the \"Development Test\" [samz], meant only for testing and development."in init.lua. And first commit.I guess, Development Test ISN'T VERY GOOD BASE for a game "like Juanchi for kids". It's just weird! And where's attribution of devtest?
Not to mention you give all players a Chest of Everything by default which is like creative mode even if it is disabled.
This is bizarre, devtest is not a good base to make a game from. It's designed for testing the engine
Btw, according to what he said in Package approval comments:
Retextured DevTest with some "modz" instead of "mods" is UNIQUE AND UNREPEATABLE? Like, seriously? I can make hundreds of "unique" games like this, and will be approved? Just why??
And also, message for wsor: WHY did you approve this game? Is it THAT DIFFICULT for you to see obvious devtest copypaste? When reviewing my mcl_decor mod, you just saw screenshots and said that I stole everything (when basically I didn't), just cuz nodes from my mod were looking familiar to homedecor and ts_furniture ones (sorry, but armchair in 1x1 node size cannot be that unique!), without even looking up in my code.
And after these all things, after weeks of making comments in approve thread and fixing license issues, I see THIS approved??? WHAT THE HELL?
no, also this is runs langauge, not mine, i dont agree with it
stuff only gets approved that meets the package approval terms. the editors are only human.
i didnt look at the git history, normally am checking things found at https://content.minetest.net/policy_and_guidance/ such as license in the source (if there is a source) and it matches what is on cdb, that none of the assets are mc/mc texture packs from mc that i am aware of. (games)also looking to see if there are common mods that have had attributation stripped, etc. (mods) also looking to see if it uses a existing modname, and if that falls under the forks and reimplementations or not, etc. just to name a few things that are checked.
no, i said it appeared you used content from other mods without citing them
i actually did look at the code, repo, etc. additionally i had another cdb editor double check what i saw and agree, hence the first post. you did at least admit to one of them and fixed it. the others with consultation with another cdb editor we agreed to let pass, as could be common use, etc and could always be addressed later if more information came to light
you can see this had its own issues before being approved, additionally, when it was reported and verified, it was taken down with changes needed
Okay, Wsor seems to be right (sorry for emotions in my previous comment) but I still have questions to runs. No license violations anymore as I can see, but I want to reply.
Basically, no? Like, DevTest isn't the right game for this, even if you will modify it a lot I (and, I guess others too) need proofs about speed. Devtest can be fast cause it has only basic things inside and some test stuff, but your one is "supermodified and and super-vitaminized". If you will send them, maybe we will be like "Yeah, devtest is the best game ever, let's do forks of it cuz it's the fastest"? ;)
And also,
So, you're trying to make editor ignore user (in that case, me) just because this user said bad things about your game? Lol And about "mind his own business": what do you mean? I didn't use assets from these mods, homedecor was inspiration for me (just like some minecrap furniture mods) and I took sitting function from ts_furniture, not a single nodebox or something. If you're making voxel furniture in 1x1 size nodes, it WILL look familiar to voxel furniture from other mods, but that doesn't mean one of those furniture mod authors is a plagiator. In your case, you just took game made for development and testing stuff only and made weird mod soup out of it, without clear attribute. Now it's added, no problem. Just like no problem with my mcl_decor mod.
If I'm a "novice" modder, that means I can't say anything about your game or what? You just don't like listening to criticism as I can see. That's ridiculous for you as a modder. Your first comment there already was enough, but anyway you wrote 2 more emotional crap. bruh