basically what thepython said, think ive answered in more detail elsewhere.
..... you can actually use it for testing when you need even more minimal that void, but I would highly recommend just using that in like 99.9% of cases for testing stuff
while this arguably comes close to falling to a convert to thread and tell the author to file a bug report/use a normal thread, not going to. however in terms of this being a learning experience:
How can i see how it evolves over time
you can view the releases for the package bottom right corner (on desktop). this is also available via the api (iirc)
or report issues
use a normal thread (tbh, what this should have been), or message the user on [pick a platform there on]
Please add a link to version control for this mod
while i support this, i dont support what comes after..........
i will make it a thumbs up.
this is kinda not good/toxic(for lack of a better word coming to mind rn) tbh, aka do what i want, else i will just leave this review up (at least not hurting) and not make it positive (till you do what i want) isnt really the best......
converted this to a thread since the orginal situation i was joking/meming/trolling about has been fixed
converted review into a thread
just doing my part.... :P
i beleive the context is this from the orginal long description
converted review into a thread
basically what thepython said, think ive answered in more detail elsewhere.
..... you can actually use it for testing when you need even more minimal that void, but I would highly recommend just using that in like 99.9% of cases for testing stuff
package has been transfered
bug reports/feature reports, etc should be reported on the packages issue tracker or cdb threads
converted review into a thread
please use a packages issue tracker or cdb threads for bug
converted review into a thread
please file bug reports on the package issue tracker, or if it lacks one, a cdb thread
converted review into a thread
converting this to a thread since the bug has been fixed and no update has been made in some time
converted review into a thread
its uptime/issues
just popping in to "unsuggest" notabug due to it being rather unreliable
done
please use the packages issue tracker or threads for bug reports
converted review into a thread
please use package issue tracker or threads for bug reports
converted review into a thread
github shows the author is still to a degree active, additionally looking at your issue, the error does not seem to match your claim
please use threads or the packages issue tracker for bug reports
converted review into a thread
please use packages issue trackers or threads on cdb when not available for bug reports
converted review into a thread
please use threads or a packages issue tracker to report bugs
converted review into a thread
please use threads or a packages issue tracker to report bugs
converted review into a thread
self reviews are not allowed
converted review into a thread
please use the packages issue tracker or a thread for reporting bugs
converted review into a thread
please use the issue tracker or a normal thread for bug reports
converted review into a thread
while this arguably comes close to falling to a convert to thread and tell the author to file a bug report/use a normal thread, not going to. however in terms of this being a learning experience:
you can view the releases for the package bottom right corner (on desktop). this is also available via the api (iirc)
use a normal thread (tbh, what this should have been), or message the user on [pick a platform there on]
while i support this, i dont support what comes after..........
this is kinda not good/toxic(for lack of a better word coming to mind rn) tbh, aka do what i want, else i will just leave this review up (at least not hurting) and not make it positive (till you do what i want) isnt really the best......
please use packages issue trackers or normal threads for bug
converted review into a thread