as reported to you on discord over a week ago, this mod is breaking other mods (that load after it) by writing to the global namespace. context: (https://github.com/mt-mods/pipeworks/issues/97) please fix this and resubmit for review
You where informed that a review "Varies depending on how busy staff are and how many packages are sitting in the review queue". We do this of our own free time and effort, not paid, etc. frankly being controversial isnt going to make someone giving up there own time to be here want to help more in an adverse situation. regarding "I wasted the entire fucking day on your bullshit", you can upload to cdb and not use git (however is the most common given most people do use it for source control). the additional factors appear to be outside our control.
converted review into a thread
please use the issue tracker/normal threads for bug reports
converted review into a thread
please use issue trackers or normal threads for bug reports
converted review into a thread
please use issue trackers or normal threads for bug reports
converted review into a thread
see title ^^
see title ^^
no, cdb reviews are not for bug reports
also migrated this package to Dirkfried and there fork (cdb should make a new release tonight) as the existing one is abandoned
please use the issue tracker/a normal thread for reporting bugs
converted review into a thread
please use the issue tracker for reporting bugs
converted review into a thread
please use the issue tracker or a normal thread for bug reports
converted review into a thread
as reported to you on discord over a week ago, this mod is breaking other mods (that load after it) by writing to the global namespace. context: (https://github.com/mt-mods/pipeworks/issues/97) please fix this and resubmit for review
please use the issue tracker for bug reports
converted review into a thread
please use the issue tracker for bug reports
converted review into a thread
please use a packages issue tracker (or if lacking one) a normal thread for bug/issue reports
converted review into a thread
please use the issue tracker or normal threads for reporting issues
converted review into a thread
please use the issue tracker or normal threads for reporting issues
converted review into a thread
useless review, enough said
please use the issue tracker for bug reports
converted review into a thread
prs welcome
hello, just popping in to say this:
You where informed that a review "Varies depending on how busy staff are and how many packages are sitting in the review queue". We do this of our own free time and effort, not paid, etc. frankly being controversial isnt going to make someone giving up there own time to be here want to help more in an adverse situation. regarding "I wasted the entire fucking day on your bullshit", you can upload to cdb and not use git (however is the most common given most people do use it for source control). the additional factors appear to be outside our control.
please use the packages issue tracker or a normal thread for bug
converted review into a thread
please use the issue tracker for submitting bug reports
converted review into a thread
please use the issue tracker for submitting bug reports
converted review into a thread
please use a packages issue tracker (or a normal thread) for bug reports and feature requests